25 August 1851; In Which Mrs Pennylegion Forms an Opinion of The Strange and Beautiful Sorrows of Ava Lavender

The Strange and Beautiful Sorrows of Ava Lavender by Leslye Walton (Note: who is FEMALE)

Genre: Magical realism, Fantasy

Pages: 301

Published: 25 March 2014, by Candlewick Press

Purchased: 19 August 1851, from Mr Doe's Bookshop

Recommended? Only the first half. I think..


Dear Gertrude,

Have you forgotten how to read, or to write? It must be one of the two, for I saw you on Thursday and you seemed very much alive. In any case, I have finished The Strange and Beautiful Sorrows of Ava Lavender, and I have thoughts.

First of all, I must regrettably inform you that the author, Mr Leslye Walton, is in fact very American, strong English name aside. This must explain much of his novel’s strangeness. He has made up all sorts of machines and words, and the combined effect makes the story feel set entirely apart from here. I did not know that Americans have begun to write about the future (1904 to 1959!) as if it were the present, but they are always getting ahead of themselves in other ways, so I supposed it is to be expected.


American irregularities aside, the first half of this novel has given me some faith in Mr Doe. He may sell us only strange books, Gertie, but I think that we may yet discover some gems. This one is mainly concerned with the history of a very peculiar family full of people who can turn into birds and see vases when they look at themselves in the mirror and so on (they are French, of course). The writing is lovely--full of the dreamy brutality of faerie tales--and follows the lives of three women, of whom Ava Lavender is least important.

Oh Gertie, I am not convinced that you will love it as I did, but I think you must try, so long as you promise to stop at the first half. The second, unfortunately, dashes the entire thing against the rocks. I was so cross with it that had Bess put the novel up upon the high shelf for punishment. It sits there now, as I write, staring beseechingly down, but I will not give in.

You see, the second half of the novel is exceedingly vulgar, and I do not mean vulgar in the way about which that governess of mine sniffed (what was her name?), though there is a moment of that. I mean vulgar in the sense that the author seems to turn from an accomplished pianist spinning out a song to a tone deaf novice pounding at the keys.

It all begins with the entrance of one Nathaniel Sorrows. Compared to the humanity of all the other characters, he is nothing more than one of those paper dolls we played with at ten, with a dastardly face scribbled on in charcoal. He only exists to do mad, evil things because the author has decided that mad, evil things alone will engender sufficient sympathy from the reader.

And then, afterward, the consequences of the mad, evil things Nathaniel Sorrows does are erased with an authorly wave of the hand. The author deals with none of the mess he makes for his characters, the titular one especially. They all simply decide to feel better, and then do. Of course, this renders the latter half entirely meaningless. I was left with no feeling at all for the book, unless a desire to sneak vinegar into the tea of the author counts as a feeling.

This does not seem a very good recommendation, does it? But it is. I will find a way to force you to read the first half, though I may have taken apart the binding and burned the rest by the time you see it.  

With love,
Prudence Pennylegion

No comments:

Post a Comment